Legal Opinion
Bagnall v. CSU Maritime
District Court, E.D. California
Decided October 29, 2024No. 2:23-cv-01606Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 | Eric James Bagnall, No. 2:23-cv-01606-KJM-CKD 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 California State University Maritime, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 17 Defendants move to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil 18 | Procedure 12(b)(6). ECF No. 51. The matter is fully briefed, and the court held a hearing on 19 | July 12, 2024. See generally Opp’n, ECF No. 53; Reply, ECF No. 54; Mins., ECF No. 59. 20 In response to a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, the court begins by assuming the complaint’s 21…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- David Schwake v. Arizona Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- John Doe v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- General Security Services Corp. v. County of FresnoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011