Legal Opinion

Employers Protective Life Assurance Co. v. Gatlin

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 3, 1969No. 5-4867PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

This action was brought by the appellee to recover $1,000 in benefits under a hospitalization policy which was applied for but never actually issued. The trial court, sitting as a jury, made a general finding of fact tliat a valid contract liad in fact been agreed upon. This appeal is from the ensuing judgment for $1,000, plus penalty and attorney’s fee. For reversal the insurer argues that the proposed agreement was never consummated.

The facts, stated favorably to the appellee, are simple. On August 10, 1967, Fred Nolan, a soliciting agent for the appellant, called…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Holland v. Interstate Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  2. Union Life Ins. Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  3. Dove v. Ark. National Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  4. Gott v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Watts v. Life Insurance Company of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Constitution Life Insurance v. M. D. Thompson & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  3. Collister v. Nationwide Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Collister v. Nationwide Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Constitution Life Insurance v. M. D. Thompson & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API