Macri v. Clements & Ashmore, P.A.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
The appellants challenge a summary judgment entered for the appellees on *764wrongful death claims with allegations of medical negligence. Among other defenses, the appellees asserted that those claims are precluded by the exclusivity of remedy provision in the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan, at section 766.303(2), Florida Statutes. The appellants maintained that the claims are allowed under the “willful and wanton” exception in section 766.303(2). In entering summary judgment the court reasoned that the claims could not proceed as the appellants had not pled the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Martinez v. ScanlanSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- Galen of Florida, Inc. v. BraniffSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
- Gugelmin v. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- University of Miami v. KleinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Schur v. Florida Birth-Related NeurologicalDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Samples v. Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Ass'nSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
- MacRi v. CLEMENTS AND ASHMORE, PADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009