Legal Opinion

State v. Audett

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 2006No. 77576-1PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1

Madsen, J.

The Court of Appeals reversed Daniel Audett’s commitment as a sexually violent predator and remanded for new commitment proceedings based on this court’s decision in In re Detention of Williams, 147 Wn.2d 476, 55 P.3d 597 (2002), published after Audett’s trial, holding that chapter 71.09 RCW precludes the trial court from ordering a CR 35 exam in a sexually violent predator proceeding. The State contends that the Court of Appeals erred in applying Williams in this case and that it was within the trial court’s discretion to order a mental exam pursuant to CR 35. We hold that…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Cipriano v. City of HoumaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Lunsford v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Lunsford v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. In Re Personal Restraint of DuncanWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. In re the Detention of DuncanWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. In Re Detention of PostWashington Supreme Court · 2010

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API