Legal Opinion

Lane v. Fern

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1910Published

ELECTION CONTEST.

1Dissent 1

*305OPINION BY

2Dissent · HartwellHartwell, C.J.

Petitioner, who was a candidate for the office of mayor of the City and County of Honolulu alleges that at the-election held November 8, 1910, there were violations of the election laws in the sixth precinct of the fourth election district by reason of sixty-four electors having “voted after five o’clock and cast their ballots after five o’clock in the afternoon of the said day, whose ballots were counted by the election inspectors for the office of mayor,” the petitioner claiming that those votes “were illegal and should not have been counted and returned,” and that- the…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Varney v. JusticeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
  2. Clarke v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1883
  3. Atkinson v. LorbeerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Powers v. HitchcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Hayes v. KirkwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API