Italian Drugs Importing Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
WilsoN, Judge:
Tbis case lias been submitted on tlie following stipulation:
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGBEED by and between the attorney for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General of the United States that the items marked “A” and initialed JJO by Examiner J. J. O’Connor, Jr. on the invoice covered by the above protest assessed with duty at 45% ad valorem and 74 per lb. under the provisions of Paragraph 28 of the Tariff Act of 1930 consists of Ino B-Omnia imported from Italy.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that said item was manufactured by Eoscama Industria Farm, Italiana,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lloyd Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
- Simon v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
- Badische Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- Gernet v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
3Cited by9 opinions
- Swissedent International v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
- Auto Imports, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
- Stern v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Doulton & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- Vivadent Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.