Legal Opinion

Bloom v. Bloom

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1910No. 8404PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Thurs-ton county, Mitchell, J., entered June 7, 1909, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for divorce.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

The only question raised in this case is the sufficiency of the findings to support the decree. Two grounds for divorce were set up in the complaint; failure to support, and that the appellant has so conducted himself as to cause respondent great anguish of mind, humiliation, and shame, and that his conduct made it impossible for her to longer live with him as his wife, or to entertain any affection for him. Certain facts were pleaded which need not be repeated here. The case went to trial upon the complaint and answer, which was a general denial.

The point is made that the court did not find…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McDougall v. McDougallWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Stanley v. StanleyWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Wheeler v. WheelerWashington Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gibson v. GibsonWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Pierce v. PierceWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Hilleware v. HillewareWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Amana Global Company v. King CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
  5. Frizzell v. FrizzellWashington Supreme Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API