People v. Hildebrand
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Clinton. (Smith, J.) Eespondent was convicted of larceny. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
Complaint was made against Hildebrand before a justice of the peace, charging him with .the larceny of an overcoat of the value of $30, the goods and chattels of Allen Brieker, and in his possession. The justice issued a warrant, in which he recited that Allen Brinker had made the complaint, and following the language of the complaint in other respects, except that the property was charged to be the property and in the possession of Allen Brinker.
The respondent was arrested and brought before the magistrate, where, by his counsel, he made a motion to ■quash the warrant, for the reason that…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Albrecht v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- In Re Leslie Fay Companies, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- People v. NicholsMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- People v. PichetteMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- State v. MullenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.