Hastings v. Cunningham
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth District, City and County of San Francisco. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
This is an action for a partition, and the only question involved in this appeal is whether Sharp or Moon has succeeded to the interest formerly held by Samuel W. Haight in the premises sought to be partitioned. Sharp claims under certain proceedings in insolvency instituted by Haight; while Moon claims under a judgment and execution sale.
The insolvency proceedings were had in the Fourth District Court. The order to show cause, and also the usual restraining order, was made on the 26th of July, 1855. The petition and schedules were presented to and received by the Judge on the 27th, as…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hahn v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- McDonald v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
3Cited by6 opinions
- Foster v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Los Angeles County Bank v. RaynorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Clark v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- Montgomery v. MerrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Baum v. RoperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.