Legal Opinion
Biro v. Sidley Austin, No. 95 0149415 S (Apr. 19, 2001)
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided April 19, 2001No. 95 0149415 SUnpublished
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION 276 Objection TO REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT AND MOTION 278 OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST TO LEAVE TO AMEND
By way of a Request to Amend, dated September 15, 2000, the plaintiff's in the instant action seek to amend its complaint.
Whether to allow an amendment is a matter left to the sound discretion of the trial court. [An appellate] court will not disturb a trial court's ruling on a proposed amendment unless there has been a clear abuse of that discretion.'" AirKaman, Inc.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Airkaman, Inc. v. GroppoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Cook v. LawlorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Drew v. K-Mart Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Esposito v. PresnickConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Mezes v. MeadConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.