Legal Opinion

State v. Farmer

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 12, 1973No. 46,907PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Kaul, J.:

The defendant (James V. Farmer) appeals from a felony conviction by a jury for the delivery of Tedral Expectorant, a nonnarcotic drug, in violation of K. S. A. 1971 Supp. 65-2601, 2602 and 2607 [repealed, Laws of 1972, Chapter 234, Section 41, effective July 1, 1972]. Tedral Expectorant, the drug in question, was alleged to be a salt, compound or derivative of a barbituric acid, within the definition of the term “drug” as set out in 65-2601 (1) (a). The activities of defendant and his nephew by marriage, Billy R. Wilson, on November 24, 1971,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. DoyleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  2. State v. HamrickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  3. State v. RunnelsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  4. State v. CorySupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  5. State v. ReichenbergerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. HunterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  2. State v. ThielNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  4. State v. ShehanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  5. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API