Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Brown

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided May 9, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Feely, S.

When the issue herein was moved for trial, without jury, certain questions arose as to whether the recent ruling in the Schillinger Case (258 N. Y. 186, affg. 231 App. Div. 679, which revd. 135 Misc. 42) had any effect on other procedural matters in contested probate than the proper charge to a jury as to undue influence. The decision in the case cited concerned only the propriety of a charge to the jury on the “ burden of proof,” that was based on the authorities now grouped in Miller v. Blumenshine (343 Ill. 531; 76 A. L. R. 362, 373); and on that point each appellate court appears…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Probate of the Will of SchillingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of SchillingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  3. Miller v. BlumenshineIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  4. In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of SchillingerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of HeughesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API