Legal Opinion

Reimold v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 27, 1944No. 8547PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge.

The sole question involved here arises under Section 23(e) (1) of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Code, § 23(e) (1).1

The taxpayer contends that a loss arising from a stock transaction was properly deducted by him as incurred “in trade or business.” The facts, briefly, as found by the Tax Court are: The petitioner is president of two affiliated corporations, Woburn Degreasing Company of New Jersey and Woburn Degreasing Company of Massachusetts. His father, Reimold, Sr., had been president of the companies at the time of his death in 1918. He was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Higgins v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. White v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Dederick v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Stuart v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clark v. KavanaghCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
  2. Clark v. KavanaghDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1944
  3. Solomon v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974
  4. Trimble v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API