Legal Opinion

Clark v. Kavanagh

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 7, 1945No. 10008PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKS, Circuit Judge.

Suit by apellants against appellee to recover $20,562.81 paid under protest as income taxes for 1939. The case was tried by the District Judge without a jury. Emory W. Clark, the only appellant having any interest here, will be referred to as the taxpayer.

The evidence consisted of stipulated facts adopted by the court and the testimony of the taxpayer. The question here is one of law, namely, whether under Sec. 23(e) of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U. S.C.A. Irit.Rev.Code, § 23(e), the taxpayer is entitled to recover the amount sued for, as a deduction for loss incurred,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stuart v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1936
  2. Reimold v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. H. F. Keeler and Alice H. Keeler, His WifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  2. Markle v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1952
  3. Markle v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1952
  4. Markle v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API