Midland Credit Co. v. White

Opinion by

Ross, J.,

This is the second time this case is before us, on precisely the same legal issue. In Midland Credit Co. v. White, 175 Pa. Superior Ct. 314, 104 A. 2d 350, we held that the lower court erred in receiving in evidence testimony concerning telephone conversations in which the caller was not properly identified as the plaintiff; and we awarded a new trial. We regret that we must remand the case once more for retrial, but justice requires it.

This prolonged litigation had its inception in a replevin action instituted by Midland, a finance company, to obtain possession of an…