Legal Opinion

Hall v. Brusseau

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 4, 1956No. 4443PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.

The defendant seeks dismissal of the plaintiff’s action because it was “begun within one year after the original grant of administration” (RSA 556:1), and hence under the statute is not to be sustained. The plaintiff’s declaration shows the action to be one of tort for personal injuries and specifically refers to R. L., c. 355, s. 9, which provides for the survival of tort actions for personal injuries “subject to the limitations, set forth in the five following sections.” RSA 556:9. The plaintiff asserts that her action is not subject to section 1 of the chapter, but is controlled solely by…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  2. Blue Mountain Forest Ass'n v. Town of CroydonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  3. Dionne v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  4. Guerin v. New Hampshire Catholic Charities, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  5. Trovato v. DeveauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API