People v. Bastien
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stamos
At issue in this case, which is before us on the State’s motion for a supervisory order, is the constitutionality of section 106A — 2 of the Illinois Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 38, par. 106A — 2). Section 106A — 2 provides that in a child sexual abuse case, the trial court may order that the child’s “oral statement or testimony” be recorded on videotape. The videotape is admissible at trial if, among other things, the child is available to testify at trial. We hold that the challenged provision is unconstitutional.
BACKGROUND
In the underlying case, defendant,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Coy v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. InadiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Perry v. LeekeSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. DiefenderferSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- State v. ApilandoHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. BowenIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. PeckAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
- State v. PilkeyTennessee Supreme Court · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.