Legal Opinion

Neterer v. Dickinson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 3, 1922PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCulloch, C. J.

The Walnut Ridge-Alicia Road Improvement District in Lawrence County was created by a special statute enacted by the General Assembly. Road Act No. 43, regular session, 1919. The statute authorized the improvement of a public road running between Walnut Ridge and Alicia, and authorized the appraisal and taxation of the benefits for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement. The section of the statute pertinent to the controversy now before us reads as follows:

“Section 30. If, for any reason, the improvement herein authorized and directed shall not be made, all expenses and costs…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Board of DirectorsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  2. Board of Directors v. DunbarSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  3. Hill v. EcholsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  4. Gibson v. SpikesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  5. Harrison v. AbingtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Robert D. Holloway, Inc. v. Pine Ridge Addition Residential Property OwnersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. SearsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  3. Western Crawford Road Improvement District v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  4. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Walnut Ridge-Alicia Road Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  5. Southern Crawford Road Improvement District v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API