Sugar Creek, P. B. & P. C. R. v. McKell
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of West Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, District Judge.
These cases are heard upon a motion to remand them to the state court. The application for the removal in the condemnation case was made in conformity to the statute, as is shown by the record, and is in fact conceded by counsel who make the motion to remand.
Two points are relied upon to support the motion to. remand. First, that the trial of the right to condemn is only cognizable in courts of the state under whose laws and within whose boundaries proceedings are had, and that the courts of the United States are without jurisdiction; second, that a part of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Searl v. School District No. 2Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Bellaire v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Mineral Range R. Co. v. Detroit & Lake Superior Copper Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan · 1885
3Cited by9 opinions
- County of Allegheny v. Frank Mashuda Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Manufacturers' Commercial Co. v. Brown Alaska Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1906
- South Dakota Cent. Ry. Co. v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- Deepwater Ry. Co. v. Western Pocahontas Coal & Lumber Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of West Virginia · 1907
- Alabama Power Co. v. Gregory Hill Gold Mining Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.