Munoz v. Kihlgren
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WRIGHT, Judge.
After an automobile collision, appellant Juan Munoz, an uninsured driver, sought to recover economic-loss damages from respondents, who were insured. The district court granted respondents’ motion for dismissal and dismissed the case with prejudice. Munoz appeals, contending that, under the Minnesota No-Fault Automobile Insurance Act, an uninsured driver may recover economic-loss damages from an insured tortfeasor. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
Appellant Juan Munoz, the owner and driver of his vehicle, was involved in a collision with August Kihlgren, who was driving a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Barton v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Pecinovsky v. AMCO Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Loven v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.