Legal Opinion

Munoz v. Kihlgren

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 20, 2003No. CX-02-1908Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WRIGHT, Judge.

After an automobile collision, appellant Juan Munoz, an uninsured driver, sought to recover economic-loss damages from respondents, who were insured. The district court granted respondents’ motion for dismissal and dismissed the case with prejudice. Munoz appeals, contending that, under the Minnesota No-Fault Automobile Insurance Act, an uninsured driver may recover economic-loss damages from an insured tortfeasor. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

Appellant Juan Munoz, the owner and driver of his vehicle, was involved in a collision with August Kihlgren, who was driving a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Barton v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  4. Pecinovsky v. AMCO Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  5. Loven v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API