Legal Opinion

Richards v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 13, 2004No. 44A03-0404-CR-202PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RATLIFF, Senior Judge.

STATEMENT OFP THE CASE

Brook T. Richards appeals his convietion, of criminal confinement, a Class D felony. 1 We affirm.

THE ISSUE

Whether the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction of criminal confinement.

FACTS

Richards and one Kim O'Conner had had a rather tumultuous relationship, and they lived together for some period of time. This relationship produced one child, C.R., who was born on March 5, 1998. Although Richards and Kim never were married, and paternity of C.R. never was established, both parties agree that Richards is the biological father of C.R.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miller v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Maxwell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Drury v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Matter of BridgesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Dishmon v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Perrey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Francisco Garcia v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Perrey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API