Richards v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RATLIFF, Senior Judge.
STATEMENT OFP THE CASE
Brook T. Richards appeals his convietion, of criminal confinement, a Class D felony. 1 We affirm.
THE ISSUE
Whether the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction of criminal confinement.
FACTS
Richards and one Kim O'Conner had had a rather tumultuous relationship, and they lived together for some period of time. This relationship produced one child, C.R., who was born on March 5, 1998. Although Richards and Kim never were married, and paternity of C.R. never was established, both parties agree that Richards is the biological father of C.R.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Miller v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Maxwell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Drury v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1970
- Matter of BridgesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Dishmon v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
3Cited by3 opinions
- Perrey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Francisco Garcia v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- Perrey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005