Legal Opinion

(PS) Chand v. Rich-Banales

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 9, 2024No. 2:23-cv-01583Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHARON S. CHAND, No. 2:23-cv-1583 DC SCR (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 ALTA CALIFORNIA REGIONAL CENTER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff, Sharon S. Chand, filed this action pro se and paid the filing fee. The case was 19 accordingly referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Pending before the 20 undersign is Defendants’ motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) under Rule 21 12(b)(6). ECF No. 5. 22 For the reasons stated…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API