Legal Opinion

People v. McCall

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 30, 1996PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant was convicted, after a jury trial, of two counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree. Before trial, the court issued a ruling precluding the People from introducing evidence of any "transactions” other than the two charged drug sales. At trial, a police officer testified that four individuals approached defendant after the charged sales occurred and that he observed "some hand movement” but "couldn’t really see what was going on other than they were right around him.”…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. NuccieNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. People v. DeGinaNew York Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. GreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. People v. BrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. People v. ShakurAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. People v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. People v. BaldwinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API