Legal Opinion
Globe Air, Inc. v. Thurston
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided December 23, 1981PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUFRESNE, Active Retired Justice.
Globe Air, Inc., the plaintiff-appellant, unsuccessful in its bid for a State contract to conduct aerial spraying for Eastern Spruce Budworm suppression in certain selected areas of the State of Maine, seasonably filed in the Superior Court, Kennebec County, its petition for judicial review of the award of the reference contract to Bie-gert Aviation, Inc., by the Forest Insect Manager, Maine Forest Service, Department of Conservation. Pursuant to the statutory provisions for such review (5 M.R. S.A. §§ 11001-11008), Globe Air specifically sought the following…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. GleasonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Hazzard v. Westview Golf Club, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
- Public Employment Relations Board v. StohrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- Teel v. ColsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dongo v. BanksSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Christian Action Network v. MaineDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2010
- Carroll F. Look Construction Co. v. Town of BealsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
- Campaign for Sensible Transportation v. Maine Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- Wood v. Cives Construction Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.