Legal Opinion

Ginsburg v. Byers

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 27, 1927No. 25,949PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Certiorari to review the order of the industrial commission awarding compensation under the workmen’s compensation act.

The employe Ginsburg worked for his employer Byers on road work in Iowa. Ginsburg lived in Iowa; Byers lived in Minnesota. Upon the completion of the Iowa work Byers, in Iowa, employed Ginsburg to do road work in Minnesota, and while so employed he sustained an injury. The only question is whether the Minnesota compensation act is the governing law. Ginsburg claims that it is; Byers and his insurer claim that it is not.

The compensation act provides for elective compensation…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. District Court of Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  2. State ex rel. McCarthy Bros. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  3. State ex rel. Maryland Casualty Co. v. District Court of Rice CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  4. Krekelberg v. M. A. Floyd Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Aleckson v. Kennedy Motor Sales Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  2. Degray v. Miller Bros. Con. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1934
  3. Watts v. LongNebraska Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Industrial Commission v. GardinioOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Buckingham Transp. Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1937

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API