Krekelberg v. M. A. Floyd Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, O.
Certiorari to review the action of the Industrial Commission in awarding compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law of this state for an injury sustained at Burlington, Iowa.
The facts are admitted and liability is conceded. The sole question in dispute is whether the claimant is entitled to compensation under the Minnesota Compensation Act or under the Iowa Act. Under the Minnesota Act he would receive $20 per week; under the Iowa Act $15 per week.
Both the claimant and his employers are residents of the city of Minneapolis. The employers, M. A. Floyd Company, are building…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. District Court of Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- State ex rel. McCarthy Bros. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- State ex rel. Maryland Casualty Co. v. District Court of Rice CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Banks v. Albert D. Howlett Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
3Cited by11 opinions
- Aleckson v. Kennedy Motor Sales Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Cook v. Minneapolis Bridge Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Hargis v. McWilliams Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
- Ginsburg v. ByersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Bradtmiller v. Liquid Carbonic Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.