Legal Opinion

Nioras v. Village of Rye Brook

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 15, 2010PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for unjust enrichment, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Scheinkman, J.), entered June 23, 2009, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint for failure to comply with CPLR 9802, and denied his cross motion, inter alia, for summary judgment on the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the notice of claim requirements of CPLR 9802 apply to this action (see CPLR 9802; Solow v Liebman, 175 AD2d 867, 868-869…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nassau County v. Incorporated Village of RoslynAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Solow v. LiebmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Greco v. Incorporated Village of FreeportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Martz v. Incorporated Village of Valley StreamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Matter of BT Holdings, LLC v. Village of ChesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
  2. Matter of South Nyack Police Assn. v. Village of S. NyackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API