Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Department of Labor & Industries

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 5, 1980No. 7586-1-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCallow, C.J.

The Board of Industrial Insurance Appeals declined to review the decision of a hearing examiner that Penny Hansen was not an innocent victim of a criminal act and therefore ineligible for benefits under RCW 7.68, the crime victims compensation act. The hearing examiner's proposed decision and order was adopted as the written decision of the board as required by RCW 51.52.106. The ruling was affirmed by the Superior Court. We also find no error and affirm.

The appeal presents two questions: First, did the board adopt a proper legal standard to determine whether Hansen was an innocent victim of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ancheta v. DalyWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Garrison v. Washington State Nursing BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Smith v. HollenbeckWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Sisley v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Schuffenhauer v. Department of Employment SecurityWashington Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. West Hill Citizens for Controlled Development Density v. King County CouncilCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  2. City of Auburn v. HedlundCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  3. Sargeant v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  4. State v. HalsenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  5. City of Auburn v. HedlundCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API