Legal Opinion

Davidson v. Beco Corp.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1987No. 16922Published

1Opinion of the Court

753 P.2d 1253 (1987)

114 Idaho 107

Howard DAVIDSON, d/b/a D & E Construction, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

BECO CORPORATION, Beco Construction Company, Inc., Doyle Beck and Elizabeth Beck, husband and wife, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 16922.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

December 10, 1987.

Fuller & Carr, Mark R. Fuller (argued), Idaho Falls, for defendants-appellants.

Holden, Kidwell, Hahn & Crapo, James D. Holman (argued), Idaho Falls, for plaintiff-respondent.

DONALDSON, Justice.[*]

Today we address whether, and under what conditions, a trial judge may admit statements contained in settlement negotiations to be…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Quick v. CraneIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Soria v. Sierra Pacific Airlines, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. FenleyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. People v. MotaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Davidson v. Beco Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API