Davidson v. Beco Corp.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DONALDSON, Justice.*
Today we address whether, and under what conditions, a trial judge may admit statements contained in settlement negotiations to be used to impeach contrary testimony given at trial. We hold the statements may be admitted by a trial judge, but only after deciding their probative value outweighs the resulting prejudicial effect.
This case comes to us on a petition for review from our Court of Appeals. In a reported decision, Davidson v. Beco Corp., 112 Idaho 560, 733 P.2d 781 (Ct.App.1986), the appellate court addressed a number of issues: (1) whether a party needs to renew *108an…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Quick v. CraneIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
- Soria v. Sierra Pacific Airlines, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. FenleyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. MotaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Arkansas Sheriff's Boys' RanchSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- State v. RaudebaughIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. EnnoIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. HesterIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. HairstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. EllingtonIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.