Legal Opinion

Davidson v. Beco Corp.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1987No. 16922PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONALDSON, Justice.*

Today we address whether, and under what conditions, a trial judge may admit statements contained in settlement negotiations to be used to impeach contrary testimony given at trial. We hold the statements may be admitted by a trial judge, but only after deciding their probative value outweighs the resulting prejudicial effect.

This case comes to us on a petition for review from our Court of Appeals. In a reported decision, Davidson v. Beco Corp., 112 Idaho 560, 733 P.2d 781 (Ct.App.1986), the appellate court addressed a number of issues: (1) whether a party needs to renew *108an…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Quick v. CraneIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Soria v. Sierra Pacific Airlines, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. FenleyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. People v. MotaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Arkansas Sheriff's Boys' RanchSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. RaudebaughIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. EnnoIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. HesterIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. HairstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. EllingtonIdaho Supreme Court · 2011

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API