Legal Opinion

Hampton v. Gilmore

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 16, 1974No. 9726PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent Umphres has filed a “Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” Rule 84.10, V.A.M.R. For the reasons hereinafter stated, the motion is sustained and the appeal is ordered dismissed.

*443February 11, 1974 — Appellant, representing himself (in propria persona) filed a notice of appeal in the Circuit Court of Scott County from “order . . . entered in case No. 7918 on January 10, 1974.”1 Accompanying this was a “Motion for Leave to Proceed on Appeal in Forma Pauperis.” Copies of the notice and motion were erroneously sent to the St. Louis District2 which forwarded them here as required by Mo.Const. Art. V,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kattering v. FranzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  2. Lane v. KattMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. World Franchisers, Inc. v. BirkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Parker v. WallaceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. First Community State Bank v. NewhartMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cersosimo v. CersosimoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Riley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Vodicka v. Upjohn Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Herrman Lumber Company v. CoxMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. State v. WhiteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API