Legal Opinion

Graham v. Prevost

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided September 29, 2015No. 2015-CA-1033PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAX N. TOBIAS, JR, Judge.

|, The plaintiffs/appellants, Dionisha Graham and Derrick A. Graham, Sr. (“the Grahams”), appeal the trial court’s judgment that found that the defendant, Mar-keita Prevost, is properly qualified as a candidate for State Representative for the Louisiana House of Representatives, District 99 in the 25 October 2015 primary election. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

Objecting to her candidacy,1 the Grahams contend (assign as error) that the trial court erred in finding Ms. Prevost was domiciled in District 99 by abusing its discretion (1) not to consider testimony…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Landiak v. RichmondSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
  2. Messer v. LondonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  3. Russell v. GoldsbySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  4. Becker v. DeanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  5. Dixon v. HughesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Karen Schindler v. Derek T. Russ and the Honorable Darren LombardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2022
  2. Veronica Braggs Versus Simeon Dickerson and Jon A. Gegenheimer, Jefferson Parish Clerk of CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API