Legal Opinion

Russell v. Goldsby

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided September 25, 2000No. 2000-C-2595PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

780 So.2d 1048 (2000)

Robert Weldon RUSSELL, III

v.

Reggie GOLDSBY and John J. Dahmer.

No. 2000-C-2595.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 22, 2000.

Concurring Opinion September 25, 2000.

Rehearing Denied October 4, 2000.

Richard A. Schwartz, Amite, Counsel for Applicant.

Joe Arthur Sims, Walter Richard House, Jr., Counsel for Respondent.

Concurring Opinion of Justice Lemmon, September 25, 2000.

2Per curiam

At issue in this election matter is whether plaintiff has met his burden of proving that defendant, a candidate for the office of mayor of a municipality, Amite City, failed to satisfy the requirement that he…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Messer v. LondonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  2. Dixon v. HughesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  3. Autin v. TerrebonneLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Herpin v. BoudreauxLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Pattan v. FieldsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by59 opinions

  1. Landiak v. RichmondSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
  2. Becker v. DeanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  3. Williams v. FahrenholtzLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Trosclair v. JosephLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Davis v. GaleNebraska Supreme Court · 2018

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API