Legal Opinion

Bridgeport Machine Co. v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 4, 1932No. 30,748PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*712The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This was an action to recover money for machinery furnished and for the appointment of a receiver. The immediate question is whether certain parties were guilty of contempt of the district court of Sedgwick county. Judgment was entered adjudging certain respondents guilty of contempt and ordering them to turn over to a receiver of that court an oil and gas lease and certain drilling machinery located thereon.

The case in which these proceedings were had was brought by the Bridgeport Machine Company against Arthur A. Beard, Inc. The petition…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Empire Trust Co. v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1916
  2. McKinney v. LandonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
  3. Mound City Co. v. CastlemanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
  4. Sullivan v. AlgremCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
  5. La Rue Holding Co. v. EssexCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Graves v. National Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  2. Small v. SmallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  3. Schaefer v. MilnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  4. Watts v. WattsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  5. In Re the Guardianship & Conservatorship of MillerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API