Diebold, Inc. v. Record Files, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Chief Judge.
Defendant, Record Files Inc., moves to strike the supplemental complaint filed February 18, 1953; and further asks for dismissal of all portions of the complaint relating to the patent of Walter F. Regenhardt, No. 2,169,769. It asserts that the pertinent claims of Patent No. 2,169,769 are invalidated by an attempted but invalid disclaimer.
Facts respecting the disclaimer are set out in the supplemental complaint, and a copy of the disclaimer is attached thereto. The disclaimer is dated November 18, 1952, and the supplemental complaint reveals that it was published in the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Altoona Publix Theatres, Inc. v. American Tri-Ergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Milcor Steel Co. v. George A. Fuller Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Hailes v. Albany Stove Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Cincinnati Rubber Mfg. Co. v. Stowe-Woodward, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
- Thys Co. v. OesteDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.