Legal Opinion

Stevens v. Rite-Aid Corp.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 24, 1995No. 29PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KARWACKI, Judge.

We are called upon in this case to analyze Maryland Code (1991), § 9-736 of the Labor and Employment Article,1 the “reopening” provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Act. Under that section, an injured claimant who has received an award of workers’ compensation is entitled to request additional compensation if the modification of the award “is applied for within 5 years after the last compensation payment.” We issued our writ of certiorari to determine whether an award of a claimant’s attorney’s fees and costs by the Workers’ Compensation Commission (hereinafter ‘WCC”)…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chanticleer Skyline Room, Inc. v. GreerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. Montgomery County v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  3. Holy Cross Hospital of Silver Spring, Inc. v. NicholsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  4. Stevenson v. HillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  5. Stevens v. Rite-Aid Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Stachowski v. Sysco Food Services of Baltimore, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Uninsured Employers' Fund v. DannerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. Thompson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. Buskirk v. C.J. Langenfelder & Son, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. Mona Electric Co. v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API