Legal Opinion
Sandusky Wellness Center, LLC v. Medtox Scientific, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided April 25, 2017No. Case No. 12-CV-2066 (PJS/HB)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Patrick J. Schütz, United States District' Judge
Defendants MedTox Scientific, Inc. and MedTox Laboratories, Inc. (collectively, “MedTox”) faxed an unsolicited advertisement to plaintiff Sandusky Wellness Center, LLC (“Sandusky”). In- response, San-dusky filed this putative class action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227. Sandusky now moves to certify a class of 3,256 persons who received the fax, ECF No. 229, -and MedTox moves to dismiss Sandusky’s lawsuit for lack of standing, ECF No. 234. For the reasons that follow, the Court *356grants Sandusky’s motion…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Matthew Carlsen v. GameStop, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Bradley Van Patten v. Vertical Fitness GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Greenley v. Laborers' International UnionDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2017
- Chavez v. Our Lady of Lourdes Hosp. at PascoWashington Supreme Court · 2018
- Gorss Motels Inc. v. AT&T Services, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
- Grupo Petrotemex, S.A. DE C.V. v. Polymetrix AGDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
- United/XcelRx, LLC v. Express Scripts, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2019