Legal Opinion

Hohauser v. Municipal Credit Union

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 17, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherman, J.

Although the submission of this controversy by means of an agreed statement of facts is somewhat meagre and vague, we have concluded in view of the importance of the law question presented, which it is desirable should be settled, to take jurisdiction of the controversy.

Plaintiff is a city marshal, and defendant is a domestic banking corporation whose business' is to make loans to its members, who give therefor their promissory notes. It recovered judgment in the Municipal Court of the City of New York against certain individuals for a sum of money and execution thereon was delivered to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Crofut v. . BrandtNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. McCarthy v. BonyngeNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1884
  3. French v. Bankverein SuisseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  4. Grayrook Land Co. v. WolffNew York Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Auerbach v. HesseAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Allcock v. CohenNew York Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Hirsch v. MarshNew York Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API