Legal Opinion

Kaufman v. Wolf

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1890No. 6670PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Milam. Tried below before Hon. Eugene Williams.

1Opinion of the Court

STAYTON, Chief Justice.

—On January 22, 1881, Hudson & Son made an assignment under the statute for the benefit of such of their creditors as would accept under it and release them.

C. E. Wynne was appointed assignee and qualified on January 31,1881, by giving bond required by the statute, with Julius Kaufman, Julius Runge, and J. S. Perry as sureties, conditioned for “the faithful discharge of his duties as assignee and to make proportional distribution of the net proceeds of said estate among the creditors entitled thereto.”

On October 1,1881, the assignee had in hand a fund with which to pay…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wofford v. UngerTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Wynne v. Simmons Hardware Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Ratcliff v. LeunigIndiana Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wichita Nat. Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  2. Acers v. AcersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
  3. Crawford v. Lawyers Surety Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API