Wynne v. Simmons Hardware Co.
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from .Milam. Tried below before the Hon. W. E. Collard.
1Opinion of the Court
Stayton, Associate Justice.
Thomas F. Hudson & Son made an assignment, under the statute, for the benefit of such of their creditors as would consent to take under it and release them.
C. E. Wynne was made the assignee, and he qualified and proceeded to administer the insolvent estates.
This action is by many of the consenting creditors to recover from the assignee several sums of money claimed to have been illegally paid out by him in the course of his administration* to remove him therefrom and to have some other person appointed in his stead.
The money is sought for the benefit of all…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Tudor v. HodgesTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Fitzgerald v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Hoenig v. Texas Commerce Bank, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
- Golden Rod Oil Co. No. 1 v. NobleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Hughes v. PottsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.