Legal Opinion

Falcocchia v. Saxon Mortgage, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 12, 2010No. CIV. S-09-2700 LKK/GGHPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, Senior District Judge.

This case involves the foreclosure of plaintiffs’ mortgage. Their First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) names enumerates nme causes of action. Defendants Saxon Mortgage, Inc., Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc., and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas move to dismiss all claims against them. 1 The court concluded that oral argument was not necessary in this matter, and decides the motion on the papers. For the reasons stated below, the motion to dismiss is granted in part.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Refinancing 2

On or about July 12, 2006, Greg Roh (who is not party…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Robert R. Cervantes v. City of San Diego San Diego Police Department Dennis Sesma Officer Carlos Garcia Les Wardwell Officer Eugene BojorquezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Oracle Corp. v. Druglogic, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
  2. Pratap v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
  3. Buckheit v. DennisDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
  4. Falcocchia v. Saxon Mortgage, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2010
  5. Bowler v. Wells Fargo Bank NADistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API