Legal Opinion
United States v. Tirouda
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 10, 2005No. 03-50433, 03-50434, 03-50446PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WARDLAW, Circuit Judge.
Zineddine, Salah, and Zoubida Tirouda appeal from judgments convicting them of passport and immigrant fraud offenses in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 1542, and 1546. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We consider whether the district court violated the Tiroudas’ due process rights by instructing the jury to consider an alleged accomplice’s testimony, which favored the Tiroudas, with greater caution than that of other witnesses. We also consider whether the district court erred in failing to define “accomplice” in that instruction. We join the Fifth and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Henderson v. KibbeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Cool v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Ronald JordanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Johnnie T. WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- United States v. James LloydCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Julio Cesar Ruiz, United States of America v. Angel Eliazar Noriega-ValenzuelaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. BenfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.