Legal Opinion

Balmert v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 5, 2010No. 08-4433PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SILER, Circuit Judge.

Pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., Maribea Balmert appeals the district court’s judgment upholding the benefits determination of Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company (“Reliance Standard”). Concluding that Balmert received a full and fair review of her claim and that Reliance Standard’s benefits determination was not arbitrary and capricious, we affirm.

BACKGROUND

Balmert began her employment with Big Lots, Inc. as an accountant-tax analyst in 2001. Her position required her to sit most of the day…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. John Halpin v. W.W. Grainger, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  4. Wanda Glenn v. Metlife (Metropolitan Life Insurance Company) and Long Term Disability Plan for Associates of Sears, Roebuck and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  5. William L. Baker v. United Mine Workers of America Health and Retirement FundsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pettaway v. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass'n of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  2. Kouns v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2011
  3. Pettaway v. Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API