Legal Opinion

William L. Baker v. United Mine Workers of America Health and Retirement Funds

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 9, 1991No. 90-5626PublishedCited by 146 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff-appellant William L. Baker appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant-appel-lee, the Trustees (“Trustees”) of the United Mine Workers of America (“UMWA”) Health and Retirement Funds (“1950 Pension Trust”), in this action for pension benefits. The district court sustained the Trustees’ determination that Baker was not eligible for pension benefits from the 1950 Pension Trust. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

I

Baker is a former coal miner who claims to have been employed in the bituminous coal industry from 1929 to 1958. Defendants are…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Gaynell Boyd v. Trustees of the United Mine Workers Health & Retirement FundsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989

3Cited by146 opinions

  1. Wanda Glenn v. Metlife (Metropolitan Life Insurance Company) and Long Term Disability Plan for Associates of Sears, Roebuck and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  2. Patricia Elliott v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  3. Bernstein v. CapitalCare, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  4. Mona Evans v. Unumprovident CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  5. Gerald W. Killian and Martha R. Killian, as Co-Executors of the Estate of Carolyn Matkin, Deceased v. Healthsource Provident Administrators, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998

141 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API