Miller v. Provost
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WHITE, P. J.
— In this action we determine that the holders of a deed of trust, recorded in December of 1977, have a right to exercise the private power of sale granted in the deed of trust even though the statute of limitations has expired on the secured debt, since the date for payment of the debt does not appear in the public records.
Factual and Procedural Background
On December 16, 1977, plaintiffs’ parents, Harry and Jean Miller, sold a parcel of industrial real property (the collateral property) to defendants Edward L. Provost and Albert Grim. In connection with this transaction,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Booth v. HoskinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Hohn v. Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Curry v. US, Small Business Admin.District Court, N.D. California · 1987
- Flack v. BolandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Sipe v. McKennaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Lueras v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Rosenfeld v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
- Garcia v. Wachovia Mortgage Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
- Angell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Bank of New York Mellon v. Citibank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2017
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.