Legal Opinion

Furney v. Dukes

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 8, 1970No. 25983PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Felton, Justice.

1. “The same rule requiring definiteness of description of land in a deed is applicable to a contract for the purchase of land. Harper v. Kellar, 110 Ga. 420 (35 SE 667). A description of land in a deed, in order to be valid, must identify the land or must contain a key by the use of which the description may be applied by extrinsic evidence.” Blumberg v. Nathan, 190 Ga. 64, 65 (8 SE2d 374). “ 'A deed, for a description of the land conveyed, may refer to another deed or to a map; and the deed or map to which reference is thus made is considered as incorporated in the deed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blumberg v. NathanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  2. Deaton v. SwansonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  3. Harper v. KellarSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. Residential Developments, Inc. v. MannSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Frazier v. RaineySupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  2. Beller & Gould v. LisenbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  3. Five Dee Ranch Corp. v. Federal Land BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  4. Deljoo v. Suntrust Mortgage, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API