State v. Armstrong
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GEER, Judge.
Defendant Thomas Rashad Armstrong, a registered sex offender, appeals from a judgment entered based on his conviction under N.C. Gen.Stat. § 14-208.18(a)(1) (2013) for unlawfully being present at a place intended primarily for the use, care, or supervision of minors. On appeal, defendant primarily argues that N.C. Gen.Stat. § 14-208.18(a)(1) is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. However, because defendant does not have standing to bring an overbreadth challenge or a facial vagueness challenge and because the evidence supporting the application of the statute overwhelmingly…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- United States v. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Holder v. Humanitarian Law ProjectSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Virginia v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Does v. CooperDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2015