Legal Opinion

Hampton v. Cale of Fort Myers, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 19, 2007No. 4D06-3762PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKlein, J.

This is an appeal from an order, awarding attorney’s fees under section 57.105, Florida Statutes. We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding fees, and hold .that a 2002 amendment to section 57.105, which requires twenty-one days’ notice to the non-moving party to withdraw a challenged claim or defense, is not retroactive.

Plaintiff Hampton d/b/a Bob’s Auto Parts (Hampton), filed this lawsuit alleging a conspiracy in restraint of trade in violation of antitrust laws. Hampton was operating a retail auto parts business, and the essence of his claim was that the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Smith v. Department of Ins.Supreme Court of Florida · 1987
  3. Young v. AltenhausSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  4. Timmons v. CombsSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  5. Leapai v. MiltonSupreme Court of Florida · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kenniasty v. Bionetics CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  2. PALM BEACH COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD v. MICHAEL R. BAKST, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY FOR EAGLE ARTS ACADEMY, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API