Legal Opinion
Kenniasty v. Bionetics Corporation
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 10, 2009No. 5D07-3625, 5D07-3646PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
REVISED OPINION
GRIFFIN, J.
Frank W. Kenniasty [“Kenniasty”] and Judith Deitz and William Moore d/b/a Techniarts Engineering [“Deitz and Moore”] timely appeal the trial court’s entry of final judgment awarding Bionetics Corporation [“Bionetics”] $39,025.78 in attorney’s fees and costs against each pursuant to Section 57.105, Florida Statutes. 1 We reverse.
This case arose as a result of Deitz and Moore having prevailed in earlier litigation. In that case, Bionetics had filed a complaint against Deitz and Moore in 1999, alleging an ownership interest in motion picture film-processing [“MOPIX”]…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Magre v. CharlesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Maxwell Bldg. Corp. v. Euro Concepts, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Nathan v. BatesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Daniels v. ReevesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Airtran Airways, Inc. v. Avaero Noise Reduction Joint VentureDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bionetics Corp. v. KenniastySupreme Court of Florida · 2011