Legal Opinion
Baldwin v. Happy Herman's, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 9, 1970No. 45394PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Chief Judge.
On the second appearance of this case, we reversed the judgment entered against the defendant, The Lamas Company, Inc., on the grounds that the lower court erroneously substituted this corporation as a defendant; that it had never been served with process; and accordingly, the judgment against it was void. Lamas Company v. Baldwin, 120 Ga. App. 149 (169 SE2d 638). Certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court on October 1, 1969. 120 Ga. App. 886. Thereafter in October, 1969, the plaintiff, Baldwin, filed a motion to add the corporation as a defendant. Service of process was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Railway Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- The LAMAS COMPANY, INC. v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Cutliffe v. PryseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Lamb v. HowardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
- Williamson v. WardlawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lamas v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Lamas v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Gunnells v. Seaboard Airline RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- McCabe v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994